Search

Dermot Smyth Declares Candidacy for District 30 Seat

By Mohamed Farghaly | mfarghaly@queensledger.com


Dermot Smyth, an advocate for education and community empowerment, contends in the upcoming district 30 election.

Dermot Smyth, a passionate advocate for education and community empowerment, emerges as a formidable contender in the upcoming district 30 election for Council Member Robert Holden’s seat.

With a robust background in education policy and a deep- seated commitment to improving local schools, Smyth’s campaign resonates with voters seeking substantial reforms in the education sector. 

Smyth, a Democrat and newcomer to the political arena, emerges with a unique blend of experience and a deep-rooted commitment to community service. Born to Irish immigrant parents who sought a better life in America, Smyth was inspired by their spirit of hard work and determination. 

His father’s journey to citizenship resonates strongly with him, shaping his belief in the importance of inclusive policies and opportunities for all. Currently residing in Middle Village, Smyth has been an integral part of the district for three decades, deeply embedded in its fabric long before his political aspirations took flight. Smyth, a dedicated father, has two children: a 30-year-old daughter and a 17-year-old son. 

Smyth’s professional journey is equally diverse. Starting as a janitor, Smyth witnessed firsthand the challenges and triumphs of local schools in the late 1980s and early 1990s. Initially trained as a teacher with a degree in history from Queens College, he found his calling in education, passionately shaping young minds for years. His tenure as an educator instilled in him a profound understanding of the challenges facing both students and teachers, fueling his drive for educational reform. 

In a roundtable with the Queens Ledger, Smyth emphasized the critical role of public schools in shaping the community fabric. 

“Education is extremely, extremely important to me,” Smyth said. “I’ve been a teacher, I’ve worked in the education space for 25 years now. Education is my number one priority because our kids matter.” 

Transitioning into the political sphere, Smyth honed his advocacy skills at his current position with the United Federation of Teachers (UFT) as Political Coordinator, where he tirelessly fights for better resources and support for educators. His grassroots approach and firsthand knowledge of educational issues distinguish him from other candidates, underlining his commitment to improving educational standards and opportunities for every child.


Smyth’s diverse experience and deep ties to the community underscore his platform for inclusive policies and community development.

Smyth’s stance on education policy is nuanced, reflecting a broad understanding of the challenges facing both public and charter schools. He acknowledges the achievements of charter schools but is wary of their potential impact on traditional public schools, especially those in underserved communities. 

Smyth’s primary focus remains on education, aiming to overhaul curriculum standards, enhance teacher training, and expand access to technology in schools. Additionally, he plans to champion small businesses, advocating for policies that support local entrepreneurs and stimulate economic growth within the district. 

Central to Smyth’s platform is his support for community schools, a model he believes can bridge educational gaps and serve as community hubs beyond school hours. His endorsement of community schools aligns with his vision of community development, where schools play a pivotal role in neighborhood cohesion and support. 

Beyond education, Smyth is vocal on various community issues, including housing affordability and neighborhood preservation. He highlights the plight of residents forced to move further away due to rising costs, advocating for policies that enable families to stay rooted in their communities. 

“The issues here actually carry over across the city,” Smyth said. “Affordability in neighborhoods is everywhere, and it’s overcrowded. There’s school overcrowding. These are issues that have to be addressed, and I’m looking forward to working with community leaders and elected officials and the city administration to make sure all of these issues are addressed.” 

Throughout his campaign, Smyth emphasizes transparency and community engagement “It’s sugar coating crime that certain crimes are allowed and should be tolerated as a way of people surviving,” Smyth said. “And we’re a nation of laws. We’re a nation of laws, and if you start undermining that, or whittling away at them, it undermines the fabric of what this country is.” 

While acknowledging his limited visibility in traditional community boards, he asserts that effective leadership transcends boardroom politics.

 “Politics has gotten very, very toxic the way we have a conversation about it,” Smyth said. “People can disagree, you can have ideas and have different ideas, and that’s the way it should be.” 

Looking ahead, Smyth envisions a district where every child has access to quality education, families can afford to live and thrive, and communities are empowered to shape their own futures. His candidacy represents a call for inclusive leadership and pragmatic solutions to the district’s most pressing challenges. 

Dermot Smyth’s candidacy has garnered support from prominent figures, including Queens Borough President Donovan Richards, Congressman Tom Suozzi, Assemblyman Andrew Hevesi, and UFT President Michael Mulgrew. 

“Having known and worked with Dermot over many years in his role with the UFT, I have seen first-hand his ability to work with a variety of elected officials, city agencies, and community stakeholders, to make sure the issues advocated for were moved in the right direction,” Queens Borough President Donovan Richards said. “His knowledge of city government, and his vast experience working with leaders across the borough and city, make him the very best candidate to take on this role in the city council. I look forward to supporting Dermot in this race and working with him once elected.” 

Smyth aims to represent a fresh voice in local politics, grounded in a rich tapestry of personal and professional experiences. His candidacy symbolizes a blend of passion for education, advocacy for community interests, and a commitment to inclusive, sustainable growth for all residents of the district.

Politicians, Community Members Weigh in on City of Yes

Courtesy of @NYCPlanning

By Jean Brannum and Celia Bernhardt | news@queensledger.com

The City of Yes for Housing Opportunity got a marathon of a public hearing on July 10, with residents and representatives testifying to the City Planning Commission for over 12 hours.  

The third section of the Adams administration’s three-part City of Yes plan (with other proposals addressing climate and commercial businesses), City of Yes for Housing Opportunity includes a broad set of zoning and policy changes that would allow “a little more housing in every neighborhood.” 

Last week’s meeting was part of a larger public review phase for the housing proposal, where borough presidents and community boards can weigh in and suggest alterations. The next step after public review concludes is a binding vote from the City Planning Commission; following that, the City Council can vote to either approve, modify, or deny the plan. That final vote is expected to take place before the end of 2024. 

Many residents of Queens and Brooklyn expressed concerns about suburban neighborhoods losing their quiet environment. Some residents are worried that the population increase will exacerbate existing issues in the neighborhood. 

“Let us be clear about what this housing proposal does in fact represent: A little more Manhattan in every neighborhood,” said John Sheridan, a City Island resident who also said the changes would cause neighborhoods to lose their unique characteristics. 

On the flip side, many in the meeting argued that the changes are needed to create more affordable housing options. Vice President of Policy at TechNYC and former City Council member Marjorie Velasquez explained how the lack of affordable housing keeps potential talent out of the technology industries.

“Young professionals, even those with promising careers, are priced out of the market, forcing them to relocate or furlough living in New York City,” Velasquez said. “We want people building technology in New York City and build their families here.”

One of the most outspoken critics of the City of Yes was Councilmember Vicky Paladino, whose district includes College Point, Douglaston, and North Flushing. She said the city has pushed the proposed zoning changes “like a freight train” and said it would be better to have a pilot program for the changes. 

Paladino compared the process of the City of Yes to the legalization of cannabis, saying that the quick legalization process led to multiple smoke shops popping up around the city. 

Department of City Planning Director Daniel Garodnick argued with Paladino saying that 50% of the people in her district are rent-burdened, which means people pay more than 30% of their income towards housing. Paladino replied that her district is affordable due to Co-op apartments and condos. 

A map of community districts shows some neighborhoods in Paladino’s district built between 2,000 and 4,000 new buildings between 2010 and 2023. A section including the Douglaston area shows between zero and 2,000 new buildings. 

Carol Mccarthy from the Douglaston Civic Association said that only developers would benefit from the proposal and that no affordable housing would be built. Mccarthy also said that if the City of Yes passes, then Douglaston would consider seceding from New York City. 

“If passed we will be forced to consider the real possibility of secession from the city of New York,” Mccarthy said. “This can be done and it will be done if necessary. We have the means to do it”

Another disagreement ensued between Paul Graziano — an urban planner at the forefront of advocacy against the housing proposal — and the City Planning director. Graziano argued that increasing housing density would be “apocalyptic” due to the increase in number of people living in areas built for single-family homes. He also said that the population of New York City has not changed since 1960. According to city data and census data, the population of the city has increased since 1960 by about 1 million. 

Graziano’s other point was that the city already allows for more housing to be built, so there is no need to loosen restrictions more. Graziano claims the current zoning laws allow housing for up to 20 million people to be built now. 

“I am tired of listening to the propaganda from the City Planning Commission and Department of City Planning,” Graziano said. “You’ve heard the voices of the folks from outside of Manhattan, from the community boards, as well as the civic organizations. And if you persist in going forward with this, there will be consequences to this and we’ll find out what they are.”

Garodnick said that this has been brought up at other community board meetings and said it indicated a “fundamental misunderstanding of how zoning works.” 

According to Garodnick, land zones are rarely completely utilized due to existing buildings and finances among other reasons. He also said that the proposal would not eliminate single-family homes. Gardonkick used his response to also say that people should stick to the facts during the hearing. One person from the crowd told the committee to “stop lying” though it is not clear what they were referring to. 

The Department of City Planning will vote on the proposed changes in September. In the meantime, New Yorkers can make public statements at the next public hearing on July 24. 

Fill the Form for Events, Advertisement or Business Listing